didn’t break into the United States National Security Agency after all. The latest research into the group of cybercriminals selling alleged NSA spy tools reinforced the idea that they’d received the classified materials from an insider within the intelligence agency, security company Flashpoint said.
, which was announced earlier in the month on the blogging platform Medium by “Boceffus Cleetus,” suggests the spy tools were initially taken directly from an NSA code repository by a rogue insider, Flashpoint said. The company’s researchers analyzed the sample file containing implants and exploits and various screenshots provided in the post and have “medium confidence” that an NSA employee or contractor initially leaked the tools, said Ronnie Tokazowski, senior malware analyst with Flashpoint. However, they were still “uncertain of how these documents were exfiltrated,” he said.
ShadowBrokers first began offering more than a dozen sophisticated tools for sale — such as software for extracting decryption keys from Cisco PIX firewalls — in underground marketplaces over the summer. The post-exploitation tools, intended to give attackers a way to gain a foothold in the network or move around laterally after the initial breach, targeted flaws in commercial appliances and software. The () would have allowed attackers to spy on encrypted communications, for example.
Flashpoint’s investigators believe the files were taken from a code repository because the sample file was written in the Markdown, a lightweight markup language commonly used in code repositories to simplify how files are parsed.
for stealing government materials. Some of the tools included in the ShadowBrokers dump were among the , suggesting some kind of involvement with the theft and sale.
While Flashpoint’s Tokazowski rejected the idea that the cybercriminals had stolen the files directly through external remote access or discovered them on an external staging server, he did not draw any conclusions whether Martin was involved. While the contractor denies he gave anyone the files, it seems quite possible that someone else may have broken into his non-classified computer to steal the tools.
The theft of the ShadowBrokers files overlap somewhat with former Booz Hamilton consultant Edward Snowden who stole thousands of NSA-related documents, but Flashpoint said there was nothing linking the theft of these tools with the former NSA contractor.
“The close proximity of events raises the question if there were multiple insiders acting independently during 2013,” Tokazowski said.
Nation-state attacks and flashy attacks tend to consume most of the security attention, but malicious insiders pose a significant threat to enterprise networks because they already have access to sensitive data and systems. Most IT teams will never have to worry about dealing with a nation-state attack, but every single one of them has to face the prospect of an employee or an administrator going rogue and stealing corporate secrets or damaging the network. Mistakes as a result of careless insiders, such as when employees copy files for non-malicious reasons but the copies get stolen by adversaries, are also common.
In the case of The ShadowBrokers, the contractor or employee may have had limited access to the tools since the implants and exploits released thus far appear to be all Linux- and Unix-based. An insider with wider access would theoretically have been able to grab different types of tools.
There’s not enough evidence to understand the rogue insider’s motivations for stealing the spy tools, but Flashpoint doesn’t think it was money.
The implants and exploits in this set appear to have been developed between 2005 to 2013, such as the ElatedMonkey exploit, which targeted a local privilege escalation flaw in a 2008 version of the web hosting control panel interface cPanel. The attack tools are several years old, making it likely the NSA has already moved on to more modern exploitation tools. If the insider wanted to sell them, the time to do so was shortly after the theft.
“If The Shadow Brokers were trying to make a profit, the exploits would have been offered shortly after July 2013, when the information would have been most valuable,” Flashpoint said.